skip to main | skip to sidebar

Sax Appeal

Musica e altro. (Musings about music and stuff.)


L'uso di questo sito
autorizza anche l'uso dei cookie
necessari al suo funzionamento.
(Altre informazioni)

Friday, April 8, 2016

Simpler? No, just dumber. On language.

So Morten Just wrote a text editor/word processor that requires its owner to use words taken from the 1000 most commonly used English words, based on the Einstein-attributed quote

"If you can’t explain it to a six-year-old, you don’t understand it yourself"

(By the way, do you spot the misunderstanding of the quote? It states that you must be able to explain it to a six year old, not that you should always express yourself that way)

And Morten was surprised by the negative reactions of some of the public, as he explains in this post.

I just had to take exception, and did it in the reply that follows.

No, sorry, I cannot agree. I do concur that one should express his ideas in the simplest possible way —  but not any simpler, lest the ideas get distorted.

Besides, I think simplicity is a feat one should achieve because he thinks about it — not because it’s been given a crippled tool that forces its owner to do strange stuff. In a way, that (leaving stuff out of a tool because you don’t believe in, or know about, it) is a typical approach of some brand of software design — the email application that assumes that your username will always be equal to your email address, last sighted on windows, is an example.

Not to mention the many fields of endeavour where the original Einstein’s quote is, quite simply, bullshit. Art prose. Poetry. “Serendipity”. Formulating  the sentence “Swift is a Multi-paradigm (Protocol-oriented, object-oriented, functional, imperative, block structured) programming language” without bizarrely contorted and extended paraphrases (which I should be probably expressing as “weirdly restating its meaning using other words in much longer sentences” — see?). This happens because unusual words (especially when domain specific) synthesize required prior knowledge that would make expression unbearably long winded without making it any simpler, or clearer. Einstein himself wrote “covariant bidimensional tensor” when needed — how does that come out under the 1000 words rule?

Also, I find the idea that simple words enable clear expression incredibly naive — germane to the idea that good coding style is a feature of the programming language, rather than the programmer’s. Confused thought breeds confused and confusing expression, vocabulary breadth notwithstanding. (See Gargantua and Pantagruel for amusing examples)

Does all this amount to make your editor a tool apt to “dumbing down” (rather than simplifyng) communication? Yes, I am afraid it does.

And one last point. English (my second language) has accepted into its fold words that come from many other tongues: latin, french, german, indian, native american. The subset of english words that are familiar to— and therefore immediatley usable by — an Italian is widely different from the one a German — or a Jamaican —  would recognise. I have the idea that this alluring diversity within linguistic unity fares rather poorly under 1,000 words rule.

And I really loved what Brian Luff said (same thread):

"... although Orwell may have said

Never use a long word when a short one will do

he clearly did not mean
Never use a long word.
As far as I know, he never said
Why use a long word when you can use a lot of short ones instead?
How many short words would I need in order to suggest that your premise is an absurd extrapolation?"
Posted by Sax Appeal at 10:10 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: language, programming

2 comments:

Morten said...

I don't recall writing "never, ever use complex words" anywhere. Nice post aside from that.

I'd say it's about audience. I'd never tell anyone in my family that “Swift is a Multi-paradigm (Protocol-oriented, object-oriented, functional, imperative, block structured) programming language.” I wrote the app in Swift, and I'm not even 100% sure I understand that sentence :)

April 11, 2016 at 4:02 AM
Sax Appeal said...

I don't recall writing "never, ever use complex words" anywhere.


You didn't, in fact. And most of the jargon argument revolves, as you correctly point out, about the audience one is addressing.

When your editor is defined as a training tool to hone a particular writing skill, noone can - I think - take any exception. I am particularly fond of the parallel - drawn in the comments - with the compositional exercise of doing scales, or of creating a tune given just 4 notes, or just using whole steps.

However I believe a more fundamental problem lies (quite clearly, outside the software itself) with the apparent equation of simple expression and limited vocabulary. Of course one can produce forbidding prose by unnecessarily stacking polysyllables, desuete words and idioms (a standard lawyerly trick, I think) - and your software is a nice antidote to that.

But obscure, meaningless or confused expression can be enabled - or even enhanced - by a limited vocabulary - Valley speak like, just, like, I mean, you know? Thought so. :-). Against this, the only antidote is clarity of thought, a domain where software does not reach (yet?).

As for the Swift quote, that comes from the WP page I happened to have open at the time, and it came handy as a jargon laden example. At a second reading - as you point out - it's not a really great one at that. Protocol-oriented is quite hard to grok, and it may even be, well, bullshit, AFAIK.

Thanks for stopping by.

April 11, 2016 at 9:55 AM

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Search This Blog

Info about this blog - Legal stuff

  • Privacy e uso dei cookies
  • Disclaimer, cookies and all that jazz
  • Home

About Me

Sax Appeal
View my complete profile

My Blog List

  • Sean Carroll:Discover Blogs
    Fabrics Like Polyester Can Contain a Number of Chemicals That Might Impact Fertility
    5 hours ago
  • JAZZIT
    “Canto proibito”, quando la voce racconta una storia di ribellione. Intervista ad Ada Montellanico
    3 days ago
  • ruminazioni
    l'immarcescibile lista_libri, fumetti, film del 2019
    5 years ago
  • Casa Valdez Studios
    David Valdez Sextet live at the Blue Room
    5 years ago
  • BREW LITE's JAZZ TALES
    R.I.P. Roy Hargrove (1969 – 2018)
    6 years ago
  • Jazz: The Music of Unemployment
    What We've Become
    6 years ago
  • Tracce di jazz - Blog
    Who should headline the 50th Jazz Fest: Beyonce, Paul McCartney, ABBA, the Stones?
    7 years ago
  • note dissonanti
    Sul perchè dischi e musica improvvisata possono non andare d'accordo. Elogio dell'ascolto estemporaneo.
    9 years ago
  • flageolette
    Felish Cream: Perawatan Kecantikan dan Cream Pemutih Wajah
    10 years ago
  • all that jazz
    Welcome
    10 years ago
  • AccuJazz AccuBlog
    Charlie Haden Tribute on Bass Channel
    10 years ago
  • Mule Walk & Jazz Talk
    Mule Walk by James P. Johnson (1)
    12 years ago
  • Intelligent Life
    A Happy Birthday to a Most Wonderful Grandfather
    12 years ago
  • vitacongusto
    Happy 2013!
    12 years ago
  • MASSIMO MALTESE L'ARTE dell' IMPROVVISAZIONE JAZZ-
    LA SCALA BIZANTINA
    13 years ago
  • Jazz Beyond Jazz
    House Appropriations Committee to NEA: Keep Jazz Masters
    13 years ago
  • Aleaxity
    ubuntu.stackexchange.com now public!
    14 years ago
  • NPR Blogs: A Blog Supreme
    Native To NOLA: Kitchen Sink Klezmer, Young Brass Bands
    15 years ago
  • Hot House
  • Jazz from Italy

Blog Archive

  • ►  2019 (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2018 (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2016 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ▼  April (1)
      • Simpler? No, just dumber. On language.
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2015 (25)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2014 (39)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
  • ►  2013 (24)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (23)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (22)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2010 (31)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (28)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2008 (18)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (1)